33 . Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Additionally, the main objectives of your police is always to apprehend offenders, look into crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and over all, make certain legislation and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The law enjoins the police to be scrupulously fair on the offender as well as Magistracy is to be sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court in addition to from other Courts, However they have did not have any corrective effect on it.
A decrease court may not rule against a binding precedent, regardless of whether it feels that it is unjust; it may well only express the hope that a higher court or even the legislature will reform the rule in question. If the court thinks that developments or trends in legal reasoning render the precedent unhelpful, and wishes to evade it and help the regulation evolve, it could either hold that the precedent is inconsistent with subsequent authority, or that it should be distinguished by some material difference between the facts of your cases; some jurisdictions allow for the judge to recommend that an appeal be performed.
ten . Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The law enjoins the police for being scrupulously fair into the offender as well as the Magistracy is to ensure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court and also from other courts but they have didn't have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.
This ruling has conditions, and since the petitioners unsuccessful a qualifying exam, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based to the Niazi case analogy. 9. In view of the above facts and circumstances on the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 on the Constitution. Read more
13 . Const. P. 209/2025 (S.B.) Saifullah Jamali (Disable) V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi After arguing the matter at some length, both parties have agreed to your disposal of the instant petition around the premise that the DIGP Malir will listen to the petitioner and private respondents and will get care of many of the facets of the case and ensure that no harassment shall be caused to both the parties.
These past decisions are called "case legislation", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "Allow the decision stand"—may be the principle by which judges are bound to this sort of past decisions, drawing on proven judicial authority to formulate their positions.
When the state court hearing the case reviews the law, he finds that, while it mentions large multi-tenant properties in certain context, it can be actually pretty obscure about whether the 90-working day provision relates to all landlords. The judge, based to the specific circumstances of Stacy’s case, decides that all landlords are held for the 90-working day notice prerequisite, and rules in Stacy’s favor.
168 . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) Saleh Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Subject matter: Appeal At times it truly is convenient for your Judge to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, however, a Judge is under the obligation to produce an attempt to dispose of a case on benefit and more importantly when after recording of evidence it's got attained to a stage of final arguments, endeavors should be made for benefit disposal when it's got attained these types of stage. Read more
, which is Latin for “stand by decided matters.” This means that a court will be bound to rule in accordance with a previously made ruling on the same type of case.
139 . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Referring to the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 in the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice is not really served, the grievance petition can be dismissed. This is because service of the grievance notice can be a mandatory requirement and a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The law requires that a grievance notice be served around the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. If your employer fails to reply or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) click here if the organization is transprovincial.
162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It's effectively-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within 90 days. In the event the appeal just isn't decided within that timeframe, he/she will then strategy the service tribunal to challenge the original order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, as the 90 days for your department to act has already expired. To the aforesaid proposition, we are guided by the decision of the Supreme Court while in the case of Dr.
Statutory laws are those created by legislative bodies, including Congress at both the federal and state levels. When this type of law strives to shape our society, furnishing rules and guidelines, it would be extremely hard for almost any legislative body to anticipate all situations and legal issues.
seventeen . Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI forty six I have heard the learned counsel for that parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as the issues on the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(one) in the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 at hand over possession of the subjected premises towards the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to get decided because of the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer from the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has got to see this component for interim custody of the subject premises In the event the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order. Read more
The Court directed the Chief Secretary of Sindh to make sure the Act's effective implementation in line with its initial purpose and called for educational programs Bachelor degree(s) in the topic of cooperative societies. Read more